# State Management and Intent Routing

# Why State Management?

Let's first clarify what we mean by state. During the execution of an Alexa skill, you'll find that the top level structure is as such:

  1. User says something
  2. Alexa says something back. If it's a question, goto 1
  3. End skill

What Alexa chooses to say in 2, clearly depends on what the user said in 1, but what the user says next in 1, they say in response to the question asked in 2. This means that in order for your skill to produce the right Alexa speech, you need to know at least both what the user said and what the last thing Alexa asked was. In practice, long form skills will usually need to remember at least a few more things.

The totality of data that represents that memory is what we call the Current Skill State and Litexa's syntax is designed around this central idea of handling incoming intents based on that state.

# Litexa States

To define the "where are we in the conversation" part of the skill state, Litexa groups code statements into named blocks also called states, which are further subdivided into three kinds of blocks called handlers:

  1. the entry handler, executed when a state first becomes active
  2. a set of intent handlers, executed when the skill receives any a specific intent, while the state is active
  3. the exit handler, executed when a state has just become inactive, before the next state becomes active.

A few specific statements in the Litexa language apply to the skill at all times, and as such they are found outside the scope of any state. These are called global statements.

Here's a look at the syntax for defining these parts:

# global statements would go here

  # all code placed here constitutes the "entry handler" for
  # this state

  when "do something"
    # when the skill is in this state, and the user says
    # "do something", then this intent handler will execute

  when AMAZON.YesIntent
    # you can use built in Alexa intent names directly, in
    # this case the AMAZON.YesIntent which specifies various
    # ways a person might say "yes" in the current language

    # code here will be run should an intent matching none
    # of the above handlers is received while the skill is
    # in this specific state

  # all code placed here constitutes the "exit handler"
  # no more intent handlers can be defined after this point

  # this began a new state

# State Flow

When a skill begins, the skill is always set to be in the launch state, that is the state named exactly "launch", and will always run that state's entry handler.

When a handler completes, it must choose to do one and only one of three things, each specified by a statement:

  1. It can choose to end the current state and activate a new one, with the -> stateName state transition statement
  2. It can choose to stop the state machine in the current state and send the current results to the user with the LISTEN statement.
  3. It can choose to end the skill, returning all final results to the user with the END statement.

The LISTEN statement additionally takes arguments aimed at the user's device. Currently you can specify:

  1. LISTEN microphone to open the blue ring and microphone to accept user voice commands
  2. LISTEN or LISTEN events to send no specific commands to the user device, keeping the session open but NOT opening the microphone

In any case though, an Alexa skill should always expect any kind of event to appear, so neither of these variations restrict what kinds of events will appear next. E.g. even without sending LISTEN microphone a skill must be prepared to handle the user using the wake word to say something, e.g. "Alexa, help".


Each handler will completely finish before any other handler can run, and each handler will completely finish before a skill returns a response. This means that a Litexa skill, for a given user, will only ever be in one state at a time, and that the code can determine where to resume the skill by storing just the name of the state we last stopped at.

Let's look at a sample in action:

  say "Hello!"
  -> askAboutRoses

  say "Which do you prefer, red or blue roses?"
  reprompt "No really, do you like red, or blue roses better?"
  LISTEN microphone

  when "I like $color roses"
    or "$color ones"
    or "$color, I guess"
    or "$color"
    with color = "red", "blue"

    say "Hey, I like $color ones too."
      or "How about that. I like $color ones too."
    say "Goodbye"

  when AMAZON.HelpIntent
    say "Please tell me, do you like red, or blue roses?"
    LISTEN microphone

  when AMAZON.RepeatIntent
    -> askAboutRoses

    say "I'm sorry, didn't catch that."
    -> askAboutRoses

We begin at launch, presumably after the user has said something like "Alexa, launch roses". The launch state's entry handler greets the user, and then uses a state transition to go to the askAboutRoses state. That state's entry handler asks the question, then finishes with a listen statement. This causes the skill to return all say statements, ask that the microphone be opened, and begin listening for incoming events.

Let's look at a run through of the skill to understand how the rest of the handlers work out:

 user: alexa, launch roses
alexa: Hello! Which to you prefer, red or blue roses?
 user: repeat that
alexa: Which do you prefer, red or blue roses?
 user: help
alexa: Please tell me, do you like red, or blue roses?
 user: blue, I guess
alexa: How bout that. I like blue color ones too! Goodbye

Once you are comfortable with the role of the LISTEN microphone statement, you may drop it entirely: a handler that does not specify an ending will default to ending with LISTEN microphone!

# When does a state transition happen?

It's important to note that while the three statements we've described here determine what happens when a handler ends, they do not themselves terminate the handler, nor are their effects immediate. For example:

  say "what is the capital of France?"

  when "I think it's $city"
    with $city = "paris", "rome", "london"

    if $city == "paris"
      -> correctAnswer
      -> incorrectAnswer

    say "you said $city, <...1s>"
    @lastAnswer = $city

  say "That's the right answer!"

  say "I'm afraid that's the wrong answer"

In the above sample, the order of speech if the user answered correctly will be: "you said $city, <...1s> That's the right answer!" because the transitions don't happen until after the handler is complete.

You may want to read -> as queue a state transition rather than a change state now function. The statement could be replaced before the end of the handler, or even recinded if an END statement is encountered after it. This is an important part of the design of the state machine, and produces the following effects:

  • there is only ever the active state, there is no stack of states to return to. As such, there are no restrictions on the topology of of the state graph, a set of states can (and often do) sit in one or more interlocking infinite loops, a requirement for open ended interaction.

  • states are not responsible for what happens downstream, and have no parent state to consider. Any state in a loop can choose to break it, for instance, without consequence to the integrity of the state machine. This also means global code can choose to transition anywhere in the state machine without unwinding a call stack first.

  • there are no side effects from the execution of other handlers, during the execution of a single handler. After entering a state, the exit handler for a state will always be run before any other state's code is run. If this were not the case, given that any handler can prompt the next turn with LISTEN, supporting mid handler execution of other state's code could mean that that one or more dialog turns could have happened during the handler; an intent handler could find itself no longer handling that intent!

Simplifying this underlying primive it a key part of the Litexa design philosophy, with the intention of making easy to understand promises on how to reason about a program's execution: at any given moment the current position of the skill is only ever in one state, and only the code in that state will decide what happens next.

It's entirely possible though, to build more complexity on top of these primitives. Things to consider:

  • Business logic is often better expressed in your code language of choice, e.g. JavaScript. If you need an immediate effect mid handler, is it something that belongs in code?
  • States can be useful as just combinatorial flow paths, they don't have to reflect request/response stopping points. If you find yourself needing an immediate effect mid handler, could you perhaps split the handler up into a series of states to transition between?
  • You can service return paths and future branching using global variables and conditionals. This pattern shows up in "aside" flows, e.g. asking for help where you may transition to a series of help states, then want to "come back" to what you were doing. You could maintain a @currentActivity variable at all times, and then write a returnToCurrentActivity state that knows how to switch routing based on it. This would let you "interrupt" a current activity at any time, and then "blindly" return to the current activity from anywhere.


The three state transitions statements ->, END, LISTEN all overwrite each other, e.g. you can issue an END after a -> in the same state, and you'll effectively have cancelled the transition.

# Intent Handlers

# Intents and Utterances

Let's deep dive on the when statements we've seen pop up. A when statement begins an intent handler, and defines what kind of event the handler will be invoked in response to. When followed by a quoted string, the statement defines a spoken user intent, which can be followed by any number of or statements to provide variations that should invoke the same handler.


If you're unfamiliar with the Alexa concepts of intents, slots, and utterances, you may want to take a moment to brush up at the Alexa Documentation on Interaction Models(opens new window)

  say "What should we do?"

  when "go to the attic"
    or "check out the attic"
    or "look in the attic"

    say "Alright, heading upstairs."
    -> checkOutAttic

  when "go to the basement"
    or "what's in the basement?"
    or "how about the basement?"

    say "If you say so."
    -> checkOutBasement

This fragment would contribute two new intents to an Alexa skill, automatically named GO_TO_THE_ATTIC and GO_TO_THE_BASEMENT, each with a variety of utterances.

You can optionally provide an explicit name for your intents, with which you can recycle their use in other parts of your skill without repeating their whole definition.

  say "What should we do?"

  when AttackEnemy
    or "attack the enemy"
    or "swing my weapon"
    or "swing the sword"
    say "Heave!"
    -> askCombo

  say "What do we follow up with?"

  when AttackEnemy
    say "You know that thing is heavy, right? Fine."
    -> doubleAttack

Where you have utterances that are permutations of a single grammar, you can use inline alternation to generate them. You can mix and match inline alternation with the or statement to compose a full intent.

  when AttackEnemy
    or "swing (my|the) (weapon|sword) (at the enemy|)"
    or "(attack|kill) the enemy"
    # this produces 10 utterances, including "swing my sword"
    # "kill the enemy", and "swing the weapon at the enemy"

Finally, as Alexa will dutifully recognize any utterance across your entire language model at any time, a skill must be prepared to handle any intent while waiting in any state. To capture intents you don't expect for a given state, you can use the otherwise statement. Given that we're not distinguishing between which intent is coming in for the state, it's usually best to treat the otherwise case as a failure to understand the player's actual intent, and redirect them back into the skill's flow.

  say "What should we do?"

  when "go to the attic"
    say "Alright, heading upstairs."
    -> checkOutAttic

  when "go to the basement"
    say "If you say so."
    -> checkOutBasement

    say "I'm sorry, I didn't catch that. What
      do you think we should do next. Go to the
      attic or go to the basement?"

# Slots

Slots are variable parts of an utterance, where you expect a user to say any of a specific set of words in their place.

In Litexa we define a slot with a variable name starting with the $ character. You must then specify the type of slot using the when statement, after all of your utterances. The slot value will be accessible in the proceeding handler using the same variable name.

  say "What should we do?"

  when "Pick up the $thing"
    with $thing = "rope", "bird", "cage"

    say "Ok, you have the $thing"

Here we have state that defines a single intent, with a single slot named $thing. We define $thing as one of a list of possible words: rope, bird, or cage. In the handler, we can use the same $thing and assume it contains whatever the user said.

Beware Large Slots!

Alexa does not guarantee that the word that comes in a slot will necessarily be exactly one of the words you define for the slot. In particular, slots with many entries can and will start to pick up other user speech, if the rest of the sentence matches one of the utterances very well.

Behind the scenes, the slot we automatically created from that list was named thingType. We can recycle the same list elsewhere in our skill:

  when "Eat the $thing"
    with $thing = thingType

    say "Nope, you can't eat a $thing"

If we need slot value lists that are too unwieldy to specify with this syntax, we can instead fall back to a code function to generate them. In that case, we'll refer to a file in the litexa directory, and a function to use from that file.

  when "plant a $plant"
    with $plant = slotbuilder.build.js:plantSlots

    say "Alright, let's get a $plant going."

In litexa/slotbuilder.build.js we'd then need to define a function to return the new slot name and its values. The function will be called with the litexa parser's skill object, and the litexa language being parsed. We then assign that function to exports.

// litexa/slotbuilder.build.js
function plantSlots(skill, language){
  return {
    name: "plantTypes",
    values: [ "cucumber", "zucchini", "potato", "eggplant", "tomato" ]

exports.plantSlots = plantSlots;

We can take advantage of Alexa's built in synonym mapping by returning an object with the full slot definition. We can also mix and match the short form string with the longer object definition.

function plantSlots(skill, language){
  return {
    name: "plantType",
    values: [
        id: 'eggplant',
        name: {
          value: 'eggplant',
          synonyms: ['aubergine']
        id: 'zucchini',
        name: {
          value: 'zucchini',
          synonyms: ['courgette']

exports.plantSlots = plantSlots;

The slot building function is executed in the litexa inline context, so functions and data you've defined there, including the jsonFiles object, are available for use.

It is often convenient to iterate over your skill's data to collect values for your slots, e.g. in a quiz you may collect the answers to all your questions. When you do so, be careful to follow the Alexa guidelines for slot values(opens new window) You may find you need to sanitize your slot values by removing unnecessary punctuation.

Let's assume we have a data file at litexa/questions.json

    "q": "For which film did Angelina Jolie win an Oscar, in the year 2000?",
    "a": "Girl, Interrupted."
    "q": "What are little boys made of?",
    "a": "Snips and snails, and puppy dogs tails."

We could then extract a slot for answers with the following code in litexa/slotbuilder.build.js

// litexa/slotbuilder.build.js
function answerSlots(skill, language){
  let answers = jsonFiles['questions.json'].map( (d) =>
    return d.a.replace(/[,.]/g, ' ');
  return {
    name: 'answers'
    values: answers

exports.answerSlots = answerSlots;

# Oneshot Intents

A "oneshot" is when an Alexa user bundles an intent into their launch utterance, e.g. "Alexa, ask The Great Psychic to read runes". In the case where the user has a "The Great Psychic" skill enabled, it would get launched, and immediately presented with its "read runes" intent as part of the same request.

Normally, the Litexa flow is to deliver any incoming intents into the currently active skill, then follow any state transitions running exit and entry handlers, until a response is triggered, and then wait for the next incoming intent.

In the case of a oneshot intent, there is no current state yet, so Litexa will initialize the session by running the launch state's entry handler before processing the incoming intent. This lets a skill keep all its session initialization code in one place. Note, this means that you can redirect skill flow in the intent handler. In the following example, the skill normally goes to state askForActivity at launch but on receiving READING_INTENT will go to readRunes instead.

  # this code always runs at skill launch
  say "Welcome to the Great Psychic!"

  # by default we'd usually do this transition at a skill launch
  -> askForActivity

  when "read runes"
    # this code runs if launch also had the intent
    # this state transition overrides the one above, as intent 
    # handlers always come after the entry handler 
    -> readRunes

    # we'll acknowledge we (mis)heard something here, but otherwise
    # continue with the standard flow
    say "I didn't understand that."

  # code in the exit handler would be run no matter which way we go

  say "What should we do next? I could start a seance, or perhaps
    read the runes?"

  soundEffect runes-clacking.mp3
  say "Oh, how interesting!"
  # etc